Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Aristotle - Essay ExampleIn a comparative assessment of political arrangements, Aristotles remarks on the perversions of land have proved to be a prominent tenet of political discussion and questioning. As a staunch realist, the Greek philosopher propagated the assumption that the vagary of a governing body, which in essence is perfect, complete or best is wizard which is unattainable and utopian. Sidgwick (1892) argues that Aristotles mixed bag of the kinds of judicatures is not his own, but it is in fact the result of a pursuit to represent the ideas of his predecessor and teacher, Plato by stating the formers ideals with an augmented degree of even greater disagreements for the various types of political systems to possibly invalidate allegations of unoriginality or literary theft (Sidgwick 141-144). Aristotles primary premise is based upon his definition of the constitution which he describes as an association of positions that argon reliant upon the degree of authority or power possessed by various social classes in their division amongst the citizens. In the philosophers categorization of the ultimate political system in comparison with one which is perverted, the underlying variable is the quantity of rulers in each scenario or governmental setup. Aristotle establishes that in the case of rule by many as opposed to rule by one, democracy is a term linked with a perverted depiction of an otherwise positive concept of polity, which leads to the incidence of corruption, unequal distribution of wealth, anarchy and a consequent obliteration of the state. It should however be famous at no point does Aristotle completely discredit democracy as a hollow vex by presenting alternating scenarios where the degree of its perversion is decreased. The main criticism that Aristotle places on the system of democracy is how demagogues are able to manipulate and eventually direct the perceptions, opinions and emotions of the public such that laws begin to lose m eaning and government decrees begin to hold more significance. When such situations prevail, a democratically elected leader is transformed into a monarch or a an implicit dictator who imposes a repressive rule over the peck, without the people even being aware of it, as everything happens under the veil of democracy. It is also believed that when power is vested in the work force of poor people, who are illiterate and uninformed, they will not be able to execute effectively the responsibilities that bewilder with holding esteemed positions. In stating so, however, Aristotle does agree that a complete exclusion of the lower class from the personal matters of the state is not an appropriate option because taking such an action would increase animosities and discrepancies between the well-off and the poor rather than bridging the differences. Capitalist democracies of today have failed to recognize that a mere label of democracy that is apparently working on the basis of equality and justice is not enough to claim that the industrial plant of a political system are successful when a vast global population that lives down the stairs the poverty line is suffering so greatly. For Aristotle, democracy still stands as a form of government which has a lesser degree of perversion in comparison wit