Thursday, June 20, 2019
Punishment and Modern Society Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words
Punishment and Modern Society - Essay Example(David, 1990. pg 1) train den Haag in his article Punishing Criminals supported the implementation of death penalty and the penalizations for presbyopic time duration e.g. keeping the culprits in house take hold or sending them in to exile to reduce crime rate. The punishment are never designed or renounced on the bases of class and race. numerous sociologist believe that the crime can only be prevented by increasing the intensity of commitment on conducting it. According to a report published in Crime and Delinquency suggests at least 3000 executions yearly are necessary to make death penalty an reliable prevention of crime. This statement is actually the light of modern intellectuals rather than old scholars. the report of the National Assessment of Juvenile Corrections suggested the proportion of prisoners in US jails have greatly amounted during end of twentieth century 500.000 people were imprisoned both in adult jails and Detent ion centers. (Tony and Paul, pg 2-3)Today, the United States is following a policy of strengthening harsh and strict punishments by implementing big punishments in its states, increasing the duration of imprisonment form mevery crimes, by legalizing many compulsory sentences. (Tony and Paul, pg 20)Ruche and Kirchheimmer in on of their sphere on punishment stated the transformation in penal systems cannot be explained only from changing needs of the war against crime, although this struggle does play a part. Every system of ware tends to discover punishments which correspond to its productive relationships. In other wards one can say that these two people actually meant modern punishments to be a essential tool for the preparation of employees- personal- in the capitalist world. Under dictatorship punishment are marked to be more evil death sentences and life long punishments are increasingly adjudicated as compare to simple punishments. (Kevin and Robert, 2001, pg 159-162) The jud ge is subjected to strong pressure from above to intensify punishments on the grounds that the authority of the state moldiness be defended.... Increasing severity of punishment is in the first instance a change in criminal policy conditioned by stinting crisis. (Jeffrey and Alvin, 2000, Pg 19-26)The penal policy of the dictators of Germany excluded the probability of taking social intervention in the adjudication of punishments. Today most of the criminologists blame the working class and the middle class for any kind of crises or recession. There fore the development and implementation of new penal policies is greatly necessary, so that the crises can be resolved in a better term. (Jeffrey and Alvin, 2000, Pg 19-26)Durkheims in 1964 did a functional analysis of punishment. Marxist did a materialistic analysis of the nature and functions of punishment. He believed study of punishment to be narrate based, detailed and theoretically flat in application. Punishment has undergone many social, political and cultural changes since the sociological turn of twentieth century. There are two approaches toward the penology. (Sarah and Lesley, 2006, pg 20-21)1. study of punishment is based upon the structural factors on the basis of which governments form their
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.